This years all hands meeting was a great success! There where a few sessions that I really enjoyed.
There where many user engagement people there. I believe that we reached a consensus that there isn't much an engagement community.
For example, Wisconsin has a great method for distributing and running MATLAB and R application on the OSG, but there has been no knowledge transfer to other engagement folks. I know a few UNL users that have wanted to run MATLAB on our resources. If we could move a HCC MATLAB workflow to the Grid, I believe that would be a great success.
I completely agree that there is no Engagement 'community'. But I think that's true of most of the OSG. Though, there have been recently many improvements.
- I think the centralized Jira has helped tremendously. It's very easy to see what other people have been working on and even the general direction of progress. Though this only works for OSG 'employees' and OSG projects.
- The OSG blogs have been successful for the technology group to explain what they are working on. Though, I wish they had shorter and more often posts.
Science on the OSG
|Walltime usage for non-HEP|
Here's an updated usage graph (source):
|Walltime usage for non-HEP updated|
Chander's comment on data is also important. But I believe the problem with data isn't necessarily storage, but it's access to the data. Take for example Dropbox. For free, they offer very little storage. The main advantage is that it's accessible from anywhere, laptop, desktop, iphone, web... I think a uniform data access method can get us a lot further than distributed storage.
Alain's prediction that we will be using more community software. This will take a large effort to be part of the distribution's community. I foresee us contributing packages, patches, and effort to Fedora EPEL and possibly Ubuntu. I think we are making great strides with the packaging, and would like to continue injecting us into the Fedora community.